Friday, February 17, 2012


Way back in the 1990s, when I had a day job, I used to do research into plant/animal symbioses, and taught, amongst others things, an advanced course in symbiosis.  All eukyarotic organisms are the products of at least one symbiotic event.  The cells of animals, plants and fungi contain mitochondria, organelles that are, amongst other things, the source of most cellular chemical energy.  Mitochondria were once independent organisms, probably related to Proteobacteria, which entered into an endosymbiosis with the ancestor of eukaryotes - one of the defining steps in the evolution of life on Earth.

In addition to mitochondria, cells of algae and green plants also contain plastids, the organelles responsible for photosynthesis.  These, too, were once independent organisms, and now researchers believe they have identified the host and symbiont that are the ancestors of all species of algae and plants.  It's a hugely exciting piece of work, with equally huge implications.  DNA sequencing shows that the plastid of a species of glaucophyte, a small group of obscure, microscopic blue-green algae, retains genes associated with early cyanobacteria, the photosynthetic bacteria from which plastids are believed to have evolved.  Comparison with the gene maps of a variety of plastids suggests not only that all algae and plants evolved from a single symbiotic event, but also that another organism was involved: 'the DNA includes genes similar to those from ancient bacteria similar to the Chlamydiae bacteria.'  If the hypothesis is correct, the bacteria (which were probably some kind of parasite) have all but vanished, leaving only a few of their genes in plastids, a little like words from the languages of long-vanished civilisations that live on in English and other modern languages.  It isn't a unique phenomenon - one of the more unexpected results of the human genome project was the discovery that genes from retroviruses make up something like 8 per cent of the human genome.  We are the expression of texts from many sources.


Blogger Paul Weimer said...

I particularly like that last line, Paul. Well said.

February 17, 2012 4:11 pm  
Blogger kurt9 said...

Nick Lane argues that the endosymbiosis that resulted in mitochondria was such an improbably rare event that it is unlikely to have happened anywhere else in (at least) our galaxy. However, the endosymbiosis that resulted in the chloroblasts represents another endosymbiosis event, independent of the hydrogen hypothesis that made mitochondria. Does not two independent endosymbiotic events suggest that Nick Lane is wrong and that endosymbiosis is somewhat common?

February 26, 2012 8:37 pm  
Blogger Paul McAuley said...

If this research is right, and the evolution of chloroplasts required two symbiotic events, I'd say so.

And there are many endosymbioses outwith mitochondria and chloroplasts. I used to do research on several of them.

February 29, 2012 4:32 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts